false
OasisLMS
Login
Catalog
Advanced Numerical Modelling of Deep Excavation Su ...
Paper
Paper
Back to course
Pdf Summary
The study compares the Mohr–Coulomb (MC) and Hardening Soil (HS) constitutive models for simulating a 26 m deep excavation supported by a contiguous pile wall. This system uses spaced piles, relying on soil arching between them, and is most suitable for cohesive ground with groundwater below excavation level.<br /><br />A three-dimensional PLAXIS model represents the Santiago, Chile, case study. The 0.8 m diameter piles, separated by 0.5 m gaps, are supported by three anchor levels. Excavation and anchor installation are simulated in 13 stages, and soil response is compared at points between adjacent piles.<br /><br />The MC model treats soil as linear elastic up to yielding, with constant stiffness. In contrast, the HS model captures nonlinear, inelastic soil behaviour, stress-dependent stiffness, plastic hardening, and unloading–reloading effects. The simulations show that excavation reduces lateral stress, and the HS model reflects the associated changes in soil stiffness; MC does not. MC also predicts unrealistic strain reversals and greater excavation-side heave. Its predictions are notably sensitive to Poisson’s ratio: changing the value from 0.2 to 0.4 doubles the calculated wall deflection.<br /><br />The authors conclude that the HS model better represents realistic soil behaviour and provides more reliable deformation estimates for contiguous pile-supported excavations than the commonly used MC model.
Keywords
Mohr-Coulomb model
Hardening Soil model
contiguous pile wall
deep excavation
PLAXIS 3D
soil arching
anchor levels
lateral wall deflection
stiffness degradation
ground deformation
×
Please select your language
1
English