false
OasisLMS
Login
Catalog
Comparison of Static Lateral Behavior of Vertical ...
Paper
Paper
Back to course
Pdf Summary
The study compares the static lateral behavior of vertical and battered pile groups using three-dimensional finite element (FE) simulations. The battered-pile model was validated against a full-scale lateral load test of the 24-pile M19 pier foundation of Louisiana’s I-10 Twin Span Bridge. A vertical-pile model was then created by changing the pile inclinations. The simulations included nonlinear soil and concrete behavior and pile–soil contact effects.<br /><br />At comparable lateral loads, the battered group showed substantially greater lateral resistance, with pile-cap displacement about 60–70% lower than for the vertical group. The distribution of lateral load among pile rows also differed: the leading row carried the largest share in the vertical group (31%), whereas the two middle rows carried the largest shares in the battered group (31% and 28%). Axial loads followed a similar shift, being greatest in the leading and trailing rows for vertical piles and in the middle rows for battered piles.<br /><br />Despite the battered group’s higher overall lateral capacity, it mobilized less soil resistance. The vertical group had 58% greater mobilized front-face soil resistance and a deeper zone of influence. The authors attribute the battered piles’ improved performance to their inclination and the resulting additional axial resistance, rather than to greater soil resistance.<br /><br />The findings demonstrate that pile inclination affects group stiffness, load sharing, axial forces, and soil response. The validated FE approach offers a practical means of investigating pile-group behavior, though the conclusions are based on the modeled foundation and soil conditions.
Keywords
pile groups
battered piles
vertical piles
lateral resistance
finite element simulation
pile-soil interaction
bridge foundation
load distribution
axial forces
soil resistance
×
Please select your language
1
English