false
OasisLMS
Login
Catalog
Ground Improvement at US 101/Broadway Interchange ...
PPT Presentation
PPT Presentation
Back to course
Pdf Summary
The US 101 Broadway Reconstruction project replaced a 1949 overcrossing with a two-span bridge, new and reconfigured ramps, and retaining walls supporting the approaches and ramps. Ground conditions included fill over soft, compressible Young Bay Mud, with high seismicity and liquefaction-susceptible deposits. Retaining-wall settlement was therefore a key design concern. The presentation compares three mitigation approaches: - <strong>Preloading with wick drains</strong> to accelerate consolidation: a well-established method, but it requires space for staging and a settlement period exceeding 120 days, with potential differential settlement. - <strong>Lightweight embankment material</strong>: avoids a settlement waiting period, but loads on the wall remain a concern, and EPS blocks may require long-term maintenance. - <strong>Deep soil mixing (DMM)</strong>: mixes cement with in-place soil to create soil-cement columns that increase strength and reduce compressibility. It avoids a settlement waiting period and was an established ground-improvement technique, though its application was relatively new for Caltrans. The presentation emphasizes that the best solution is not always obvious: conventional options may be safe, while less conventional applications can involve greater risk. Successful delivery depends on research and a trusted team—including the designer, contractor, review agency, and client—and, ultimately, a willingness to take a considered leap of faith.
Keywords
US 101 Broadway Reconstruction
two-span bridge
retaining walls
Young Bay Mud
liquefaction
preloading with wick drains
lightweight embankment
deep soil mixing
ground improvement
seismicity
×
Please select your language
1
English