false
OasisLMS
Login
Catalog
Variability Assessment of Helical Piles Performanc ...
Paper
Paper
Back to course
Pdf Summary
The study evaluates whether conical helix geometry can improve helical pile performance by reducing installation-related soil disturbance and increasing axial capacity. Researchers conducted six full-scale compression and pullout tests on three pile configurations at a coastal site in Babolsar, Iran: a conventional two-helix pile and two conical piles, with helix spacing-to-diameter ratios (S/D) of 1.5 and 3.<br /><br />Conical piles showed greater initial stiffness and load capacity than the conventional pile in both loading modes. The conical pile with S/D = 1.5 performed best in pullout, while the S/D = 3 conical pile performed best in compression. Disturbance-factor results also indicated less installation-related disturbance for the conical configurations.<br /><br />To examine uncertainty from natural soil variability, the researchers used Monte Carlo simulations to generate 100,000 correlated combinations of cohesion and friction angle. They compared capacity predictions from individual-plate-bearing and cylindrical-shear methods against capacities interpreted using four load-test criteria. The reliability analysis generally favored the cylindrical-shear method, particularly when paired with lower-displacement criteria (5% or 10% of helix diameter), though the preferred criterion varied by pile configuration.<br /><br />Overall, the findings suggest that conical helix geometry can improve axial performance and reduce soil disturbance, making it a promising alternative for coastal and offshore foundations. The authors emphasize that design should account for soil variability and use suitable capacity-interpretation and reliability methods. These conclusions are based on a limited number of tests at one site and therefore require further validation across different soils and conditions.
Keywords
conical helix geometry
helical pile performance
axial capacity
soil disturbance
full-scale compression tests
pullout tests
Monte Carlo simulation
reliability analysis
cylindrical-shear method
coastal foundations
×
Please select your language
1
English